Technology Development
- Overview: Technology Development
- Advanced Technology Demonstration
- Independent Research & Development
- Defense Science Board (DSB)
- Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
- Critical Technology Element (CTE)
 
- Advanced Technology Demonstration
- Advanced Technology Development
- Applied / Basic Research
- Budget Activity (BA)
- Cooperative Research & Development Agreement (CRADA)
- Critical Technology Element (CTE)
- Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)
- Defense Science Board (DSB)
- Demonstration & Validation
- Independent Research & Development
- Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)
- Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL)
- Other Transaction Authority (OTA)
- Patent
- Research & Development Cost
- Research/Technology Funding Opportunities
- Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR)
- Small Business Technology Transfer Program (STTR)  
- Technology Assessment/Control Plan
- Technology Broad Agency Announcements (BAA)
- Technology Development Strategy
- Technology Readiness Assessment
- Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
- Technology Release Roadmap
- Technology Roadmap
- Technology Transition Initiative (TTI)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology Development
Technology Readiness Level


Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are a method of estimating technology maturity of Critical Technology Elements (CTE) of a program during the acquisition process. They are determine during a Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) that examines program concepts, technology requirements, and demonstrated technology capabilities.  TRL are based on a scale from 1 to 9 with 9 being the most mature technology. The use of TRLs enables consistent, uniform, discussions of technical maturity across different types of technologies. Decision authorities will consider the recommended TRLs  when assessing program risk. [1,2]

The DoD TRL's are defined in the table below:
Level Definition DoD DAG Description
1 Basic principles observed and reported Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology's basic properties.
2 Technology concept and/or application formulated. Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies.
3 Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept. Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative.
4 Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment. Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively "low fidelity" compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of "ad hoc" hardware in the laboratory.
5 Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment. Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so it can be tested in a simulated environment.
6 System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment. Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology's demonstrated readiness.
7 System prototype demonstration in an operational environment. Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space.
8 Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration. Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.
9 Actual system proven through successful mission operations. Actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.
Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) - Chapter 10.5.2.2

The primary systems engineering objective is to gain sufficient technical knowledge to develop the program's System Requirements Document (SRD) and to verify that the system solution(s) required technology is sufficiently mature, has a TRL 6 or above, before proceeding into an end-item design or Milestone B. [1]  

The Technology Development Strategy (TDS) will describe how a program plans to mature it’s CTE before proceeding into Milestone B. After Milestone B, a technology maturation plan/strategy should be part of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase Acquisition Strategy for those CTE that require additional concurrency and technological development to achieve a higher TRL. [1] 

The Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook - Appendix C, is the best source of TRL information. It covers:
1.  Overview of TRL
2.  Assessing Hardware CTEs
3.  Assessing Software CTEs 

AcqTips:    
- There’re different definitions of Technology Readiness Levels, so make sure you follow the one that’s specific to your program or R&D project.   

AcqLinks and References:
- [1] Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) - Chapter 10.5.2.2
- [2] Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook - Appendix C
- Technology Readiness Assessment Calculator
- Technology Readiness Review Calculator, Version 2.2
- Technology Readiness Assessment Instructions
- TRL Cheat Sheet
- Website: Wikipedia - Technology Readiness Levels

Click Here!

Sponsors

Click Here!